Market

Market
Showing posts with label third party auditing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label third party auditing. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

THIRD PARTY SAFETY AUDIT-THE RELIABILITY ISSUE

Food safety issues dominate the news these days with frequent product recalls by many major manufacturers because of safety inadequacies vis-à-vis these products. In house QC facilities in food industry are supposed to be strong, especially when it comes to reputed and large scale manufacturers but out-sourcing of analytical job is also common in countries like the US where sophisticated analytical companies are working to provide the required services. Taking a few samples and analyzing them in a reputed laboratory cannot pass of as a QC protocol and there has to be monitoring of the raw material sourcing as well as process control at every stage to ensure uniform quality of end product. Even for a large manufacturer monitoring of raw material sources coming from thousands of kilometers away can be a daunting task and this is where third party assistance is sought to inspect facilities and handling protocols at the suppliers' end to get a reasonable assurance that safety protocols are strictly adhered to. This is crucial because many food tainting cases are traced to ingredient suppliers' end eventually. Third party auditing has evolved over a period of time because of lack of confidence on the food inspection efficiency of the regulatory agencies but whether they are really doing a better job is an issue under the scanner to day.

"The company, AIB International, lists five standards on its website that inspectors expect to see in a "facility that maintains a food-safe processing environment." They are: ensuring that raw materials are safely stored and handled; equipment, buildings and grounds are properly maintained; cleaning and sanitizing is adequate; pests monitored and managed; and staffers are working together to deliver a safe final product. When FDA inspectors actually went into Wright County's henhouses at its Galt, Iowa, plant, they found vermin, filthy dead chickens and manure oozing out of doorways. More than 1,600 people were sickened in a salmonella enteritidis outbreak linked to the farm, and over 550 million eggs were recalled due to contamination at this plant and at nearby Hillandale Farms, where lesser problems were found. Brian Soddy, AIB International vice president of marketing and sales, notes that Wright County Egg only contracted with his company to inspect its egg-grading and sorting facilities, and not the henhouses. He declined to answer whether his auditors noticed anything amiss in another part of the farm and if they would have felt it necessary, or appropriate, to notify the company if they had. The audit firms are necessary, in part, because a lot of food manufacturers "don't believe that the regulatory agencies are doing the type of job they should be doing," says Charles Cook, who founded and then sold the third-party audit firm NSF Cook & Thurber. He now runs a small firm called Country Fare Consulting in San Clemente, Calif".

Many of the recent food infection episodes originated with manufacturers who relied on reputed third party auditing organizations and this calls for a review of the system to identify the underlying reasons. One of the startling facts which emerged recently is that the inspectors from the third party auditing agencies visiting the supplier facilities are "paid and entertained" by the suppliers, raising questions regarding conflict of interest. Even if the services are paid for by the buyers, visiting inspectors invariably are well "looked after" by the suppliers during their visits and it is a matter of speculation whether such a situation can create an "obligation" for the inspecting personnel to file a "favorable" report, contrary to ground realities. Probably the human weakness for materialistic comforts will remain for ever, causing such distortions in any well designed and established systems from time to time.

V.H.POTTY

http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/
http://foodtechupdates.blogspot.com

Monday, April 5, 2010

THIRD PARTY CERTIFICATION-IS IT MORE RELIABLE?


Reliable and scientifically worked out standards are available to day for practically every food that is manufactured by the industry but what is lacking is the effectiveness of the implementation system which varies from country to country. In a country like India consumer depends heavily on government authorities to enforce safety standards since the credibility of any thing and every thing associated with private players is not easily trusted. In contrast in the US private enforcers play a crucial role in certification programs by investing in the infrastructure needed for the purpose. While government oversight is assumed to be there, private certification gives added confidence to the consumers as these agencies can be held accountable for deficiencies.

"Even brand name recognition is not the most powerful indicator of safety,"
said Peterson. "Voluntary third party certification compares favourably with mandatory government inspection and slightly ahead of traceability labelling in the mind of the consumer. In fact, most consumers would advise the food industry to invest proportionately more in certification programs than in government inspection or traceability.

There was a time when Bureau of Indian Standards (BSI) was able to provide quality assurance for ISI certified foods and the standards for these foods were slightly higher than those under the PFA which is statutory minimum standards to which all foods must conform. How ever BSI is also a GOI agency and its certification has no teeth because of its poor enforcement infrastructure. With the advent of international certification agencies in India especially for export products and organic foods, private sector is expected to play a major role in the coming years. There is even an optimism that Indian based certifiers may become a force to reckon with in the international arena soon.
V.H.POTTY
http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/
http://foodtechupdates.blogspot.com

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

THIRD PARTY AUDITING-A NEW INITIATIVE FOR FOOD SAFETY

Food safety is linked to factors like quality of raw materials used, efficiency of the process and the hygienic status of the manufacturing facilities. While most of the organized sector players take adequate precaution to ensure food safety, there can be slips occasionally due to inadvertent causes or negligence. Inspection of processing facilities regularly by enforcement authorities can bring out deficiencies not noticed by the processor. Of course there is no guarantee that such government inspections can be 100% trust worthy as has been shown in the salmonella contamination last year in peanut products in the US, in spite of inspections by the safety personnel who failed to note any thing amiss. The proposal in Australia to involve third party auditors for inspection of some of the food handling facilities may be inevitable considering the enormity of the job.

The new PPP model unveiled recently calls for selecting independent technical auditors who will be deployed only for inspection of facilities having a good track record in hygiene and sanitation. "A new Government scheme to allow independent experts to review food safety management systems will cut red tape and costs for food businesses while maintaining food safety standards. Suitably qualified, skilled and accredited independent auditors can now apply to the Food Authority for registration as eligible third-party auditors. The Authority's Director of Industry Liaison, Mr Peter Sutherland, says the new arrangement from October will initially apply for mandatory audits of hospitals, aged care facilities and delivered-meals organizations". The mandatory requirement for these auditors to report within 24 hours any violations ensures quickly addressing the problem.

The above scheme needs to be introduced for the entire food processing sector and if implemented it will lead to establishment of many independent consulting auditors with right qualification and experience. The current practice of going for ISO label or HACCP protocol does not ensure proper evaluation of the facilities and in India at least these independent auditors have some what low credibility as far as consumers are concerned. Besides these are voluntary schemes involving payment of fees to the organizations administering them where as a linkage with safety enforcement authorities will provide teeth for the government blessed third party auditors as being introduced in Australia..

V.H.POTTY
http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/
http://foodtechupdates.blogspot.com