Market

Market
Showing posts with label reliability. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reliability. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

THIRD PARTY SAFETY AUDIT-THE RELIABILITY ISSUE

Food safety issues dominate the news these days with frequent product recalls by many major manufacturers because of safety inadequacies vis-à-vis these products. In house QC facilities in food industry are supposed to be strong, especially when it comes to reputed and large scale manufacturers but out-sourcing of analytical job is also common in countries like the US where sophisticated analytical companies are working to provide the required services. Taking a few samples and analyzing them in a reputed laboratory cannot pass of as a QC protocol and there has to be monitoring of the raw material sourcing as well as process control at every stage to ensure uniform quality of end product. Even for a large manufacturer monitoring of raw material sources coming from thousands of kilometers away can be a daunting task and this is where third party assistance is sought to inspect facilities and handling protocols at the suppliers' end to get a reasonable assurance that safety protocols are strictly adhered to. This is crucial because many food tainting cases are traced to ingredient suppliers' end eventually. Third party auditing has evolved over a period of time because of lack of confidence on the food inspection efficiency of the regulatory agencies but whether they are really doing a better job is an issue under the scanner to day.

"The company, AIB International, lists five standards on its website that inspectors expect to see in a "facility that maintains a food-safe processing environment." They are: ensuring that raw materials are safely stored and handled; equipment, buildings and grounds are properly maintained; cleaning and sanitizing is adequate; pests monitored and managed; and staffers are working together to deliver a safe final product. When FDA inspectors actually went into Wright County's henhouses at its Galt, Iowa, plant, they found vermin, filthy dead chickens and manure oozing out of doorways. More than 1,600 people were sickened in a salmonella enteritidis outbreak linked to the farm, and over 550 million eggs were recalled due to contamination at this plant and at nearby Hillandale Farms, where lesser problems were found. Brian Soddy, AIB International vice president of marketing and sales, notes that Wright County Egg only contracted with his company to inspect its egg-grading and sorting facilities, and not the henhouses. He declined to answer whether his auditors noticed anything amiss in another part of the farm and if they would have felt it necessary, or appropriate, to notify the company if they had. The audit firms are necessary, in part, because a lot of food manufacturers "don't believe that the regulatory agencies are doing the type of job they should be doing," says Charles Cook, who founded and then sold the third-party audit firm NSF Cook & Thurber. He now runs a small firm called Country Fare Consulting in San Clemente, Calif".

Many of the recent food infection episodes originated with manufacturers who relied on reputed third party auditing organizations and this calls for a review of the system to identify the underlying reasons. One of the startling facts which emerged recently is that the inspectors from the third party auditing agencies visiting the supplier facilities are "paid and entertained" by the suppliers, raising questions regarding conflict of interest. Even if the services are paid for by the buyers, visiting inspectors invariably are well "looked after" by the suppliers during their visits and it is a matter of speculation whether such a situation can create an "obligation" for the inspecting personnel to file a "favorable" report, contrary to ground realities. Probably the human weakness for materialistic comforts will remain for ever, causing such distortions in any well designed and established systems from time to time.

V.H.POTTY

http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/
http://foodtechupdates.blogspot.com

Saturday, July 3, 2010

ANOTHER "REPORT"- ARE THE FINDINGS BASED ON REAL DATA BASE?


Report making is becoming a big business especially in India as many consultancy and market survey groups are emerging with offer of their services that is supposed to help new entrepreneurs, industry and the government in planning their policies and initiatives. But what competence they have and the extent of resources at their command are questions that must worry those who invest in buying these reports. If the latest report on fast food industry is to be taken at its face value one has to believe that only multinational companies are eligible to receive the tag of fast food players! The report conveniently ignores the existence of thousands of desi fast food out lets that span across the length and breadth of the country covering not only urban areas coming under Tier I, Tier II and Tier III cities but also almost all villages where there is habitation. The projection of 35% annual growth looks impressive but from where the authors got the basic data from which growth rate has been calculated. Here is a take on this report.

"As per our new research report "Indian Fast Food Market Analysis", India is blessed with one of the fastest growing fast food markets in the world. The Indian fast food market is growing at an annual growth rate of 30-35%. Almost all big fast food brands of the world have succeeded in making their presence felt in the country and most of them posting an appreciable growth. Most of the popular fast food chains have chalked out massive plans for expanding their business and presence throughout the country. Moreover, foreign fast food chains are aggressively expanding their presence in the country. For instance, Domino's plan to open 60-65 outlets every year for the next three years (2010-2012), while Yum Brands Inc is also preparing for its massive expansion across the country. It plans to open 1000 fast food outlets by 2015. Although the market has witnessed robust growth in the past couple of years, it remains largely under penetrated and concentrated in the metropolitan cities. However, there is large room for growth in tier-II cities, tier-III cities which are mostly untapped. Therefore, the future of Indian fast food industry lies in masses that live tier-II and tier-III cities".

It is called a research report but lacks clarity on many issues besides short on credibility. It has to be borne in mind that there is no agreed definition on what constitutes a fast food and when world over fast food joints are attracting scathing criticism for peddling unhealthy and nutritionally unbalanced foods. While it is an undeniable fact that these foods cause life style health disorders including CVD, Blood Pressure Diabetes and Obesity, here is an organization that is enticing new entrepreneurs through bloated claims and drawing rosy pictures about future. If the dhabas, Udipi hotels, Darshini type joints, multi cuisine restaurants etc are taken into consideration, growth of this sector cannot be 30-35% unless there is a dramatic jump in the per capita income of the population.

V.H.POTTY
http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/
http://foodtechupdates.blogspot.com

Monday, April 5, 2010

THIRD PARTY CERTIFICATION-IS IT MORE RELIABLE?


Reliable and scientifically worked out standards are available to day for practically every food that is manufactured by the industry but what is lacking is the effectiveness of the implementation system which varies from country to country. In a country like India consumer depends heavily on government authorities to enforce safety standards since the credibility of any thing and every thing associated with private players is not easily trusted. In contrast in the US private enforcers play a crucial role in certification programs by investing in the infrastructure needed for the purpose. While government oversight is assumed to be there, private certification gives added confidence to the consumers as these agencies can be held accountable for deficiencies.

"Even brand name recognition is not the most powerful indicator of safety,"
said Peterson. "Voluntary third party certification compares favourably with mandatory government inspection and slightly ahead of traceability labelling in the mind of the consumer. In fact, most consumers would advise the food industry to invest proportionately more in certification programs than in government inspection or traceability.

There was a time when Bureau of Indian Standards (BSI) was able to provide quality assurance for ISI certified foods and the standards for these foods were slightly higher than those under the PFA which is statutory minimum standards to which all foods must conform. How ever BSI is also a GOI agency and its certification has no teeth because of its poor enforcement infrastructure. With the advent of international certification agencies in India especially for export products and organic foods, private sector is expected to play a major role in the coming years. There is even an optimism that Indian based certifiers may become a force to reckon with in the international arena soon.
V.H.POTTY
http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/
http://foodtechupdates.blogspot.com