Inflation is supposed to eat into the real buying power of people and all responsible governments try hard to rein in such distortions in the economy. India is no exception to this bitter reality. Inflation affects different people in different ways, the affluent families not feeling the pinch to the same extent as those in the low and middle income groups of population. Economic liberalization in India two decades ago has unleashed a force that is influenced more by international developments than by any ameliorative policies of the national government. In a democracy every citizen has a right to protest against the policies of the government elected by him if they are found to be heaping misery on him. While the suffering citizens do expect the government to be sympathetic to his woes, bashing him for raising his voice against price rise especially of staple foods, is not an acceptable behavior of a responsible official of the very same government. Here is the controversial "admonition" from a senior minister in Indian Government who expressed his displeasure against citizens railing against price rise.
"Answering a question on the burden on the common man, the Home Minister referred to the different segments of the population and the schemes that benefit the different segments. He referred to higher MSP (as benefiting the farmers); MGNREGA (as benefiting the rural poor); mid-day meal scheme (as benefiting millions of children); and he referred to PMGSY (as benefiting thousands of villages). He referred to the price of crude oil and how the Government was constrained to first raise petrol prices and then how it was reduced twice to benefit the middle class. He then said (as can be seen from the exact text of the answer): "You mentioned high food prices. Yes food inflation is high. But higher procurement prices will reflect in slightly higher food prices. But higher procurement prices benefits millions of farmers. If you increase the price of sugarcane, sugar cannot be cheaper than before. If you increase the price of procured wheat or procured paddy, rice and wheat for the consumer cannot be less. Sometimes, and I have written about this once, we are prepared to pay fifteen rupees for a bottle of water but we will not bear one rupee increase in the price of a kilo of wheat or a kilo of rice. We are prepared to pay rupees twenty for an ice cream cone but won't pay a rupee more for a kilo of wheat or rice."
Here is a comment by an enraged citizen after hearing the above statement which aptly reflects the revulsion among the masses.
"Tea Re.1.00 Soup Rs.5.50 Dal Rs.1.50 Meals Rs.2.00 Chappathi Rs.1.00 Dosa Rs.4.00 Veg Briyani Rs.8.00 This is actual price list. These items are meant for "POOR PEOPLE" & is available at Indian Parliament Canteen. The salary of those poor people is Rs.80,000.00 per Month!! PLUS HEFTY BONUS IN SCAMS.... Pls forward to all Indians (this all money comes from our pocket, TAXES YOU PAY)"
Probably the minister, drunken with absolute power felt that he is not answerable to the people who elected him as his survival in the government depends more on paying obeisance to people not answerable to the constitution of India where accountability is the last thing that counts in public life. With luxurious life given on a platter to the "elected" representatives in the name of "serving" people, there seems to be a disconnect between common man and their representatives as reflected by the comments quoted above. Whether it is the salary, perks, living facilities, transport, communication facilities the "leaders" seem to be united in granting these privileges liberally to them selves unanimously with hardly a few seconds deliberations! Probably it is time that the present constitution is thoroughly over hauled to return the real power to the people of the country in the true sense.
V.H.POTTY
http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/
http://foodtechupdates.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment