http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/
http://foodtechupdates.blogspot.com
Consumers world over are being bombarded day in and day out with hundreds of reports, often contradicting each other, carrying information about the relation between processed foods and the killer disease Cancer. It is difficult for any layman to come to any meaningful conclusion regarding the validity or veracity of such claims. Some emanate from scientists craving for publicity while others are floated by vested interests with their own agenda, though a few are genuine. But when a serious report is put out by a scientific body of a technologically advanced country like the US, it is time one listens to its arguments and judgment.
"Traditionally, we reduce cancer risks through regular doctor visits, self-examinations and screenings such as mammograms. The President's Cancer Panel suggests other eye-opening steps as well, such as giving preference to organic food, checking radon levels in the home and microwaving food in glass containers rather than plastic. In particular, the report warns about exposures to chemicals during pregnancy, when risk of damage seems to be greatest. Noting that 300 contaminants have been detected in umbilical cord blood of newborn babies, the study warns that: "to a disturbing extent, babies are born 'pre-polluted.' " It's striking that this report emerges not from the fringe but from the mission control of mainstream scientific and medical thinking, the President's Cancer Panel. Established in 1971, this is a group of three distinguished experts who review America's cancer program and report directly to the president".
Though the report is scary, consumers, industry and policy makers cannot shy away from facing the reality as enunciated by the panel. The recommendation to use glass in stead of plastics in microwave thawing, heating and cooking is logical because of the uncertainties in terms of safety, posed by many chemicals that go in the making of different plastics. Over whelming role plastic containers play in to day's life cannot be easily reversed but glass technologists will have to come up with light, strong, crack-proof and thermally stable glass containers for use in place of plastics in the coming years. .
The eternal conflict between meat eaters and vegetarians regarding the advantages and disadvantages of meat as a human food has spawned many studies to establish the safety of meat consumption. World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF), a non-partisan organization devoted to studies on human cancer with special reference to preventive measures, recently published a report alluding to the linkage between meat consumption and cancer, advocating limited intake of meat in the diet. Naturally there is bound to be hostile response to such claims, especially from meat lobbies which question the veracity of any such reports and soundness of the scientific conclusions. .
The industry had reacted to the news that two leading scientists had suggested the WCRF report had been found to be 'significantly flawed'. The industry said a review of the original research by one of the scientists review, published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, found 'no conclusive evidence of a causal relationship' between eating meat and colorectal cancer.
While WCRF is standing by its conclusions in spite of the fierce opposition from meat industry, there is a general agreement that reducing meat consumption is good for health. According to WCRF a weekly intake of 500 gm might not be a cause of worry till further studies dwelve deep into this issue.