Market

Market
Showing posts with label virus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label virus. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

WATER FILTERS AND VIRUS REMOVAL

63 years of independence has not led to any degree of water security in practically any part of India. On the contrary the water safety has deteriorated to an extent no citizen can trust that civic bodies across the country in providing relief to him from the scourges of health afflictions caused by the so called "protected" water supply systems by drinking unboiled water. An off shoot of the failure of the government to improve quality and safety of water provided, thousands of private players have emerged manufacturing "safe" water in plastic bottles and carboys making a kill out of the fear of the citizens about "government" water!. The water processing industry also offers domestic treatment systems varying in price from Rs 2000 to Rs 20000 for "purifying" water from public supply. Now comes the report that all these treatment systems do not offer complete protection, especially from virus related infection.

"Despite loud promises that these gadgets suck out disease-causing bugs from drinking water, most purifiers sold across India do not completely eliminate water-borne viruses like Hepatitis E, says Pune-based National Institute of Virology. A study by the government-funded body that conducts research on communicable diseases and viruses evaluated eight domestic water purifier brands. It found only two - one equipped with a hollow fibre membrane and the other with a gravity-fed filter - could completely remove the viruses. The study also found no standards existed for virological evaluation of water purification devices in India and called for well-defined parameters. The NIV relied on the United States Environment Protection Agency's (USEPA) guide, standard and protocol benchmark for testing microbial purifiers".

As the above report has not emanated from any consumer activist organization and has the government authenticity there is no quarter for suspecting its bona fides. The findings assume significance in the light of emergence of virus as a major disease vector responsible for many diseases. Though the study cannot be considered complete, there are sufficient indications that the prevalent certification system for water purifiers needs urgent revisit for including their efficacy in making water virus free. Probably BIS will come out with new certification yardsticks factoring the virus removal need into the existing standards.

V.H.POTTY
http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/
http://foodtechupdates.blogspot.com

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

ENEMY'S ENEMY IS A FRIEND?-THE PHAGE THERAPY

The very name of virus evokes fear in the minds of people and deploying these vectors for crop protection and food preservation can attract adverse reaction from the consumers.The most recent viral pandemic in the form of H1N1 virus or Swine Flu virus is fresh in the memory of the world which increased the sense of apprehension about the dangers of viral vectors. Some recent research studies have brought out the benefit of using phage particles for improving yield and counteracting bacterial diseases that affect the crops like tomato which are well documented. But using the phages for food preservation may be some what far fetched as far as the consumers are concerned. Against this background clearance given for use of phages to neutralize the infection from Listeria monocytogenes by safety authorities in some countries could be a desperate move to control wide spread contamination of meat products by this pathogen. Probably the stubborn persistance of Listeria even at refrigerated temperatures must have prompted agencies to provide another tool in the hands of processors to outwit this much feared pathogen.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved phages for use in foods – but only against Listeria monocytogenes, notes food microbiologist Ipek Goktepe of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University in Greensboro. And these products find use primarily on meat and deli products, she added. But that's not bad, since Listeria is one of the most common food-poisoning agents. And a particularly recalcitrant one since it happily grows at refrigerated temperatures. Goktepe reported new data showing that Listeria phages aren't uniformly effective in protecting every contaminated food to which they're applied. Food producers would like to see at least a "4 log" reduction in bacteria – that is, a reduction to one ten-thousandth of the starting population of bugs. In some of Goktepe's tests, she may see a three log reduction or less.One recent success: An E. coli phage that targets O157:H7 strains killed a huge share of these bacterial cells that had been growing on loose lettuce and spinach leaves. When the phages were applied in a moist mist, Goktepe says, "We achieved a 3 to 7 log reduction – and that's a lot. We were not expecting that," she says. "Usually a 4 log reduction is considered very significant." She cautions that the big bacterial drop occurred under fairly ideal conditions, such as at 3 °C, a good refrigerator's temperature. Raise the leafy greens' temperature to 10 °C (about 50 °F) and the phage delivered only a 2 to 5 log drop in E. coli numbers.


The phage treatment against both Listeria and E.coli 0157:H7 opens up new avenues for protecting foods against serious microbial contaminants and it should be possible to evolve species-specific phages for widespread use by the industry. Phages occur in abundance in soil, water,sewage,feces,retail foods, process plant effluents from which high titer purified lysates can be made. Most studies have concentrated on Salmonella, Listeria. Campylobacter and Enterogenic E.coli. Typical applications include pre and post harvest spraying on animals like chickens, piglets, calves and lambs. Use of phages in refrigerated foods like fruits, dairy products, poultry products and meat has been found to be good bio-control strategy for extending their shelf life. The technique is self perpetuating, highly discriminatory, natural and cost-effective. Limitation of the phage technology include limited phage range, requirement of threshold number, phage resistant mutants and potential for transduction of undesirable characteristics from one strain to another. How far the technology can be made acceptable to the consumer is a critical question that does not have an answer to day.


V.H.POTTY
http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/
http://foodtechupdates.blogspot.com