Market

Market
Showing posts with label license. Show all posts
Showing posts with label license. Show all posts

Monday, January 12, 2015

Food safety-Whose baby it is in Kerala?

There was a time when Prevention of food Adulteration Act of 1956 )PFA) was ruling the roost till Government of India suddenly decided to replace it with the new Food Safety and Standards Act in 2006 (FSSA)which took more than five years to bring to fruition. An "Authority" was set up for implementing the regulations though it had no real authority to do much when it comes to violations happening in different states in which the enforcement responsibility is vested. One of the very first things the Authority did was a typical bureaucratic firman that every food handler must register with it and get a license, reminiscent of our early years of independence when every human activity was sought to be regulated through the much hated "license raj"! There is very little improvements at the ground level as far as food adulteration incidences are concerned and it is "happy merry go around" for food criminals and fraudsters who seem to have a vice-like grip on the consumers of this country. Look at the situation in Kerala where two different departments are fighting for hegemony as to who has the power to "inspection" of foods suspected of adulteration! Read further about this sorry state of affairs vis-a-vis the well being of the citizen! 

"Even after the full-fledged Food Safety and Standards Act-2006 came into existence, there is no clarity as to which agency should conduct the inspection of the food sold in the State - the Food Safety Department or the Health Department. Reply to an RTI query submitted on October 16, 2014, shows that the authority to conduct food inspection is vested with the Food Safety Department, not the Health Department."The lack of clarity in the matter is the primary reason why the Food Safety and Standards Act could not be implemented successfully in Kerala," says sources in the Health Department."Call it a paradox. The Health Department, which has around 5,000 staff, carries out all the activities pertaining to food safety, but without any legal backing. Meanwhile, the Food Safety Department, which is legally responsible for such activities, is facing severe staff shortage. The issue could have been easily sorted out if the Health Department officials were given the power to conduct food safety inspections," they pointed out. The RTI report says that as per a  government circular (66562/RC(3)/2012 LSGD), the role of a Health Inspector is restricted to field inspection. The local bodies issues licence based on the inspection conducted by a Health Inspector.  "But, that is a circular, not a law,"  said the sources.The RTI report further points out that according to the Food Safety and Standards Act, a medical certificate from a registered medical practitioner is mandatory, not the health card issued by the Health Department. "So, where is the legal backing for the inspections being carried out by the Health Department? Effective checking would be possible only if both the departments go hand-in-hand. In every gramapanchayat, there is one health inspector, and two or more junior health inspectors. Sadly, the government has not been able to utilise their services, and has restricted them to the areas of immunisation, family planning and prevention of non-communicable disease, which do not require strict monitoring," said the sources.The Health Department has a tendency to follow the Madras Public Health Act-1939 and the Travancore Cochin Public Health Act-1955 quite often. However, reply to another RTI query moved in the Health Department on November 22, 2014, states that Chapter-XII (from Section-114 to 121) that deals with food control, and sections of Madras Public Health Act that gives the Health Department power to tackle food safety issues, had been annulled with the implementation of the Food Safety and Standards Act. Directorate of Health Services Director Dr P K Jameela said that the Health Department had the power to intervene everything that has something to do with the well-being of the people. "Both the departments have to go hand-in-hand to make the process successful. Besides, a Unified Public Health Act can settle this issue to a great extent," she added'.

It is still not clear why the portfolio of food quality and safety is entrusted to the Ministry of Health at the Center while there is a full-fledged Ministry of Food Industries and Ministry of Consumer Affairs, either of which could have done a better job. Besides any legal or punitive action again offenders can be taken only by state authorities with clearly spelt out responsibility and accountability. Why there should be any problem at all to integrate these vigilance and prosecuting responsibilities to an integrated central agency with judicial powers is not understandable. Why not set up specialized Food Crime Courts to punish the guilty with least loss of time and send a powerful signal to criminals that they can not escape the long arm of the law through delays and obfuscation? As long as the governments in states and at the Center are not serious about these things India will prod on like this only and citizens will have to repose more faith in God to save them from harmful foods in stead of the rulers they have elected to look after their welfare!  

V.H.POTTY
http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/
http://foodtechupdates.blogspot.com

Monday, June 4, 2012

FOOD ACT AND THE SMALL PLAYERS-INDIAN DILEMMA

The much touted Food Safety Act being implemented in India since August last year seems to be a lot more controversial than originally thought. Many courts in India have stayed operation of some of the crucial sections of the Act leaving gaping holes in the safety implementation program. No doubt industry, given a chance will opt for a no-control regime with unlimited freedom to do what it feels right though such a free regime may be not to the best interest of the consumer. Any controlling policy will have to be equitable to both the industry as well as the consumer. Besides such a policy should also keep in view the practical and logistical problems different industry players may face in fulfilling the obligations cast on them by the regulations. Many small scale food handlers in India, millions in number, eking out a living selling foods, are reported to be finding it extremely difficult to continue with their day to day business because of the rigidity and impracticality of many provisions of the Act. Recent pleadings by this particular sector of food industry to modify the Act keeping in view their problems are very relevant, deserving consideration by the government. Here is a take on this issue. 

"All the vendors and small eateries use municipal water for preparing food. Everyone knows that if the water is tested it will not meet the standards specified in the act. In case the food fails quality test, the vendor will have to face jail term of six months and or fine of Rs 5 lakh. We demand that before implementing the act in Jharkhand, the state government should first improve the quality of supply water," said Sonthalia who is also the regional vice-president of the Federation of Jharkhand Chamber of Commerce and Industries (FJCCI). "We don't have food testing laboratories and the moment there is some complaint on quality of food the outlet will be sealed after collection of sample. The shop will open only after the result comes. If the result comes after one week, the shop will remain closed. We demand that the state should first set up food testing laboratories in each district and if possible have some mobile units," said Sonthalia and added if the government ignores, they would be forced to launch agitation. FJpresident Sajjan Saraf said he had written to state health secretary and requested him to exempt small traders from the purview of the act. "People having annual transaction of less that Rs 12 lakh should be exempted from taking licence for the business," said Saraf.

In a country like India where water quality in practically every urban area is suspect and in the absence of  any guarantee given by the civic authorities regarding the quality and safety of water supplied from their "protected" source, how can any responsible government punish these helpless vendors. It is to be noted that if every vendor has to invest in water purification systems it is a question of time before they go "broke"! True, the onus of giving clean and safe food is with the vendor but government has also a responsibility to provide some minimum facilities to help these minor business players to survive. Probably government of India can consider a separate mechanism to control the food quality of small vendors through appropriate modification of the law. Also for consideration is whether punishment regime for violation can be made more progressive in nature, giving more time to the small scale sector to fall in line with the national standards. Under no circumstances this sector should be allowed to be out side any control regime perpetually because of the potential dangers to consumers posed by unsafe foods, offered by some of them.

V.H.POTTY
http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/
http://foodtechupdates.blogspot.com